+207.2%
UMC vs ROST
+54.0%
+153.2%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ROST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -0.4% | +5.0% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +0.9% | +4.0% | +4.9% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -8.9% | +16.6% | +7.6% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -0.8% | +2.5% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +8.5% | +105.4% | +110.4% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +28.6% | +140.3% | +156.4% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +52.3% | +154.9% | +162.4% |
| All | +207.2% | +54.0% | +153.2% | +162.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ROST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ROST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ROST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ROST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling