+207.2%
UMC vs RGEN
+45.2%
+162.0%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.2% | +5.8% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -4.9% | +9.9% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +5.7% | +2.0% | +7.3% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +32.4% | -30.8% | -1.1% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +33.2% | +80.7% | +106.8% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +2.3% | +166.6% | +171.8% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +39.0% | +168.2% | +214.2% |
| All | +207.2% | +45.2% | +162.0% | +214.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling