+207.2%
UMC vs PTEN
+135.2%
+72.0%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PTEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.0% | +5.6% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +0.7% | +4.2% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +31.2% | -23.6% | +8.0% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +2.0% | -0.4% | +0.6% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +42.4% | +71.5% | +110.3% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +109.2% | +59.7% | +159.3% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +122.3% | +84.9% | +187.7% |
| All | +207.2% | +135.2% | +72.0% | +187.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PTEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PTEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PTEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PTEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling