+207.2%
UMC vs NVS
+27.7%
+179.5%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.9% | +6.5% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +4.0% | +0.9% | +4.5% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +3.6% | +4.1% | +7.3% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +7.8% | -6.1% | -0.4% |
| 6M | +113.9% | -0.2% | +114.1% | +115.4% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +19.6% | +149.3% | +164.8% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +28.4% | +178.8% | +205.2% |
| All | +207.2% | +27.7% | +179.5% | +205.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling