+207.2%
UMC vs NTNX
+0.3%
+206.9%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTNX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | 0.0% | +4.6% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -1.6% | +6.5% | +4.8% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +11.6% | -4.0% | +8.6% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +23.8% | -22.2% | +3.8% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +68.8% | +45.1% | +119.4% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +31.7% | +137.2% | +177.0% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | -0.9% | +208.1% | +229.0% |
| All | +207.2% | +0.3% | +206.9% | +229.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTNX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTNX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTNX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTNX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling