+207.2%
UMC vs MKC
-23.4%
+230.6%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MKC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.0% | +5.5% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -5.9% | +10.8% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -0.9% | +8.5% | +7.6% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +12.7% | -11.1% | +2.5% |
| 6M | +113.9% | -19.3% | +133.2% | +128.0% |
| YTD | +168.9% | -22.2% | +191.1% | +183.0% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | -23.3% | +230.5% | +221.8% |
| All | +207.2% | -23.4% | +230.6% | +221.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MKC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MKC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MKC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MKC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling