+207.2%
UMC vs LUNR
+75.3%
+131.9%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LUNR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | +0.7% | +3.8% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -3.6% | +8.6% | +5.3% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +5.9% | +1.8% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -56.0% | +57.6% | +6.1% |
| 6M | +113.9% | -20.5% | +134.4% | +114.5% |
| YTD | +168.9% | -8.7% | +177.6% | +166.6% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +75.9% | +131.3% | +205.1% |
| All | +207.2% | +75.3% | +131.9% | +205.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LUNR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LUNR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LUNR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LUNR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling