+207.2%
UMC vs LSCC
+72.9%
+134.3%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | +2.0% | +2.6% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +1.3% | +3.6% | +4.3% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -9.7% | +17.3% | +12.4% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -23.7% | +25.4% | +13.3% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +26.5% | +87.4% | +107.4% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +57.5% | +111.4% | +145.6% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +75.7% | +131.5% | +174.1% |
| All | +207.2% | +72.9% | +134.3% | +174.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling