+207.2%
UMC vs LPLA
+0.7%
+206.5%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -0.3% | +4.9% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -3.1% | +8.0% | +4.6% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -0.1% | +7.8% | +7.7% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +23.2% | -21.6% | +3.9% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +15.5% | +98.4% | +119.2% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +0.9% | +168.0% | +173.1% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +0.2% | +207.0% | +209.7% |
| All | +207.2% | +0.7% | +206.5% | +209.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling