+207.2%
UMC vs KIM
+9.1%
+198.1%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KIM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.3% | +5.9% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -0.8% | +5.7% | +4.8% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -5.1% | +12.8% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -0.6% | +2.3% | -0.9% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +2.4% | +111.5% | +107.0% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +19.0% | +149.9% | +157.9% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +8.4% | +198.8% | +192.1% |
| All | +207.2% | +9.1% | +198.1% | +192.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KIM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KIM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KIM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KIM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling