+207.2%
UMC vs ILMN
+127.6%
+79.6%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ILMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.6% | +6.1% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +1.2% | +3.7% | +4.6% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +9.2% | -1.5% | +5.4% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +29.8% | -28.2% | -3.6% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +69.2% | +44.7% | +94.0% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +66.4% | +102.5% | +147.1% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +123.4% | +83.8% | +171.9% |
| All | +207.2% | +127.6% | +79.6% | +171.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ILMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ILMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ILMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ILMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling