+207.2%
UMC vs GSK
+31.2%
+176.0%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.9% | +6.5% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -1.8% | +6.8% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -2.2% | +9.8% | +7.1% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -1.8% | +3.5% | +1.4% |
| 6M | +113.9% | -10.6% | +124.5% | +111.2% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +4.4% | +164.5% | +172.2% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +30.4% | +176.8% | +222.7% |
| All | +207.2% | +31.2% | +176.0% | +222.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling