+207.2%
UMC vs GH
+169.0%
+38.2%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | +0.2% | +4.4% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -0.1% | +5.0% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -1.1% | +8.8% | +7.6% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +21.3% | -19.6% | -1.1% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +73.5% | +40.4% | +98.4% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +58.0% | +110.9% | +151.7% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +163.1% | +44.1% | +182.3% |
| All | +207.2% | +169.0% | +38.2% | +182.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling