+207.2%
UMC vs GGLL
+80.0%
+127.2%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GGLL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -2.3% | +6.9% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -4.8% | +9.7% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -13.7% | +21.4% | +10.0% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -21.9% | +23.5% | +5.2% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +11.7% | +102.3% | +107.7% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +2.3% | +166.6% | +159.9% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +76.2% | +131.0% | +172.1% |
| All | +207.2% | +80.0% | +127.2% | +172.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GGLL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GGLL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GGLL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GGLL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling