+115.0%
UMC vs FLNC
-69.0%
+184.0%
-41.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | +10.2% | -12.3% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -14.7% | -2.1% | -12.6% | -14.5% |
| 30D | -32.9% | -20.8% | -12.1% | -31.6% |
| 3M | -22.2% | -61.3% | +39.2% | -15.6% |
| 6M | +25.9% | -50.9% | +76.8% | +38.9% |
| YTD | +107.9% | -69.4% | +177.3% | +124.8% |
| 1Y | +115.0% | -68.4% | +183.4% | +127.5% |
| All | +115.0% | -69.0% | +184.0% | +127.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling