+115.0%
UMC vs EAT
+109.8%
+5.2%
-41.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | +6.3% | -8.4% | -2.7% |
| 7D | -14.7% | -0.1% | -14.5% | -14.6% |
| 30D | -32.9% | +13.5% | -46.4% | -33.8% |
| 3M | -22.2% | +1.0% | -23.2% | -22.2% |
| 6M | +25.9% | +57.3% | -31.3% | +14.6% |
| YTD | +107.9% | +53.6% | +54.3% | +87.1% |
| 1Y | +115.0% | +110.8% | +4.2% | +99.4% |
| All | +115.0% | +109.8% | +5.2% | +99.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling