+207.2%
UMC vs DOCN
+254.3%
-47.1%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | DOCN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | +2.8% | +1.8% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +1.1% | +3.8% | +4.7% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -9.6% | +17.3% | +9.4% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -37.7% | +39.4% | +8.8% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +115.2% | -1.3% | +85.8% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +133.7% | +35.2% | +131.9% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +250.2% | -43.0% | +165.7% |
| All | +207.2% | +254.3% | -47.1% | +165.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DOCN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DOCN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DOCN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DOCN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling