+115.0%
UMC vs DECK
+11.2%
+103.8%
-41.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | +6.0% | -8.0% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -14.7% | +10.4% | -25.0% | -14.3% |
| 30D | -32.9% | +11.1% | -44.0% | -32.5% |
| 3M | -22.2% | -10.8% | -11.4% | -22.3% |
| 6M | +25.9% | -8.7% | +34.7% | +26.4% |
| YTD | +107.9% | -14.0% | +122.0% | +109.0% |
| 1Y | +115.0% | +12.0% | +103.0% | +103.3% |
| All | +115.0% | +11.2% | +103.8% | +103.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling