+207.2%
UMC vs CG
-24.3%
+231.5%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.6% | +6.2% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -4.3% | +9.3% | +5.3% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -5.1% | +12.8% | +8.1% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +8.7% | -7.0% | +1.3% |
| 6M | +113.9% | -9.2% | +123.2% | +113.4% |
| YTD | +168.9% | -18.9% | +187.8% | +157.2% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | -25.6% | +232.8% | +191.4% |
| All | +207.2% | -24.3% | +231.5% | +191.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling