+207.2%
UMC vs CASY
+51.2%
+156.0%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CASY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -0.3% | +4.9% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +0.1% | +4.9% | +5.0% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -11.3% | +19.0% | +5.1% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -0.6% | +2.3% | +1.7% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +10.7% | +103.2% | +107.1% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +37.1% | +131.8% | +160.2% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +52.3% | +154.9% | +202.1% |
| All | +207.2% | +51.2% | +156.0% | +202.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CASY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CASY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CASY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CASY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling