+207.2%
UMC vs BHP
+65.8%
+141.4%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -2.5% | +7.1% | +5.8% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -5.0% | +9.9% | +7.5% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +1.2% | +6.5% | +6.6% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +1.8% | -0.2% | -0.4% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +18.0% | +95.9% | +96.7% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +52.7% | +116.2% | +135.7% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +66.0% | +141.2% | +158.7% |
| All | +207.2% | +65.8% | +141.4% | +158.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling