+207.2%
UMC vs ALHC
-16.6%
+223.8%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | 0.0% | +4.6% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -0.6% | +5.5% | +4.9% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -1.0% | +8.7% | +7.6% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -10.2% | +11.8% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +113.9% | -28.3% | +142.2% | +111.4% |
| YTD | +168.9% | -31.4% | +200.3% | +152.5% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | -16.9% | +224.1% | +171.1% |
| All | +207.2% | -16.6% | +223.8% | +171.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling