+207.2%
UMC vs ACWI
+23.6%
+183.6%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACWI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | 0.0% | +4.6% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +0.5% | +4.5% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +0.9% | +6.8% | +5.9% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +2.4% | -0.7% | -2.1% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +12.4% | +101.5% | +87.0% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +15.2% | +153.7% | +129.6% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +22.7% | +184.5% | +154.9% |
| All | +207.2% | +23.6% | +183.6% | +154.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACWI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACWI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACWI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACWI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling