+156.3%
UMAC vs NTNX
+0.3%
+156.0%
-52.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTNX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | 0.0% | -3.0% | -3.1% |
| 7D | -0.9% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -7.7% | +11.6% | -19.3% | -10.4% |
| 3M | -26.4% | +23.8% | -50.3% | -30.5% |
| 6M | +61.9% | +68.8% | -6.9% | +42.9% |
| YTD | +86.5% | +31.7% | +54.8% | +70.0% |
| 1Y | +156.3% | -0.9% | +157.2% | +167.3% |
| All | +156.3% | +0.3% | +156.0% | +167.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTNX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTNX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTNX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTNX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling