+156.3%
UMAC vs BBIO
+44.0%
+112.3%
-52.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.1% | -0.8% | -2.3% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -0.9% | -2.3% | +1.4% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -7.7% | -8.7% | +1.1% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -26.4% | +11.2% | -37.6% | -31.3% |
| 6M | +61.9% | +12.5% | +49.4% | +45.7% |
| YTD | +86.5% | -2.2% | +88.7% | +82.7% |
| 1Y | +156.3% | +44.4% | +111.9% | +99.7% |
| All | +156.3% | +44.0% | +112.3% | +99.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling