+41.6%
TXN vs UMAC
+164.0%
-122.4%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -3.1% | +4.9% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -0.9% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -6.9% | -7.7% | +0.7% | -6.8% |
| 3M | -14.9% | -26.4% | +11.5% | -14.9% |
| 6M | +29.0% | +61.9% | -32.9% | +25.0% |
| YTD | +51.5% | +86.5% | -35.0% | +45.1% |
| 1Y | +41.6% | +156.3% | -114.7% | +36.8% |
| All | +41.6% | +164.0% | -122.4% | +36.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling