-17.2%
TTWO vs ECHO
+34.5%
-51.8%
-26.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.1% | -3.3% | +10.4% | +7.3% |
| 7D | +7.0% | +4.6% | +2.4% | +6.7% |
| 30D | +2.7% | +0.4% | +2.3% | +2.6% |
| 3M | -13.0% | +7.7% | -20.7% | -13.5% |
| 6M | -7.2% | -18.0% | +10.8% | -6.4% |
| YTD | -18.4% | -9.3% | -9.1% | -17.4% |
| 1Y | -17.2% | +34.2% | -51.5% | -14.3% |
| All | -17.2% | +34.5% | -51.8% | -14.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling