+87.9%
TRGP vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+187.8%
-10.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -3.0% | -1.5% | -4.5% |
| 7D | -6.5% | -13.3% | +6.9% | -6.4% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -49.6% | +49.2% | 0.0% |
| 3M | +8.8% | -54.6% | +63.4% | +9.3% |
| 6M | +11.0% | -99.8% | +110.8% | +17.5% |
| YTD | +57.4% | -99.9% | +157.2% | +67.3% |
| 1Y | +87.9% | -99.9% | +187.8% | +110.4% |
| All | +87.9% | -99.9% | +187.8% | +110.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling