+77.9%
TRGP vs MTB
+23.4%
+54.5%
-16.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.1% | -1.1% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +0.8% | +1.7% | -1.0% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +11.5% | -4.2% | +15.7% | +12.1% |
| 3M | +9.0% | +8.9% | +0.1% | +6.9% |
| 6M | +20.5% | +10.9% | +9.6% | +18.1% |
| YTD | +59.5% | +21.5% | +38.0% | +48.8% |
| 1Y | +77.9% | +21.9% | +56.0% | +68.6% |
| All | +77.9% | +23.4% | +54.5% | +68.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling