+87.9%
TRGP vs FROG
+83.7%
+4.2%
-10.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | -2.4% | -2.1% | -4.6% |
| 7D | -6.5% | -14.1% | +7.6% | -7.1% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -11.8% | +11.3% | -0.9% |
| 3M | +8.8% | +0.1% | +8.7% | +9.3% |
| 6M | +11.0% | +64.2% | -53.2% | +14.2% |
| YTD | +57.4% | +38.2% | +19.1% | +62.9% |
| 1Y | +87.9% | +85.4% | +2.5% | +93.5% |
| All | +87.9% | +83.7% | +4.2% | +93.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling