+82.5%
TRGP vs EPAM
-29.6%
+112.0%
-16.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2025-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -0.1% | +0.3% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -4.5% | +3.9% | -0.7% |
| 30D | +10.0% | +14.6% | -4.7% | +10.3% |
| 3M | +7.6% | +23.1% | -15.5% | +8.1% |
| 6M | +26.8% | -19.5% | +46.2% | +30.6% |
| YTD | +60.6% | -44.1% | +104.7% | +68.2% |
| 1Y | +82.5% | -25.2% | +107.7% | +75.3% |
| All | +82.5% | -29.6% | +112.0% | +75.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2025-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2025-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling