+87.9%
TRGP vs ACGL
+28.7%
+59.1%
-10.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | +2.7% | -7.2% | -4.5% |
| 7D | -6.5% | +8.0% | -14.4% | -6.7% |
| 30D | -0.4% | +17.3% | -17.7% | -1.3% |
| 3M | +8.8% | +11.2% | -2.4% | +8.0% |
| 6M | +11.0% | +18.2% | -7.2% | +10.0% |
| YTD | +57.4% | +15.4% | +42.0% | +55.1% |
| 1Y | +87.9% | +26.5% | +61.3% | +79.9% |
| All | +87.9% | +28.7% | +59.1% | +79.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling