+65.1%
TNA vs UMAC
+164.0%
-98.9%
-32.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -3.1% | +3.8% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -0.9% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -4.9% | -7.7% | +2.7% | -4.6% |
| 3M | +0.4% | -26.4% | +26.8% | +3.1% |
| 6M | +32.5% | +61.9% | -29.3% | +9.6% |
| YTD | +53.7% | +86.5% | -32.8% | +19.1% |
| 1Y | +65.1% | +156.3% | -91.2% | +26.4% |
| All | +65.1% | +164.0% | -98.9% | +26.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling