+38.5%
TNA vs FLNC
-69.0%
+107.5%
-32.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.4% | +10.2% | -5.8% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +2.4% | -2.1% | +4.5% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -20.8% | +19.9% | +3.3% |
| 3M | -19.2% | -61.3% | +42.1% | -4.0% |
| 6M | -0.8% | -50.9% | +50.0% | +6.7% |
| YTD | +33.2% | -69.4% | +102.6% | +53.5% |
| 1Y | +38.5% | -68.4% | +106.9% | +53.7% |
| All | +38.5% | -69.0% | +107.5% | +53.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling