+38.5%
TNA vs EOSE
-85.5%
+124.0%
-32.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.4% | +12.6% | -8.2% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +2.4% | +9.7% | -7.3% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -0.9% | -34.6% | +33.7% | +7.8% |
| 3M | -19.2% | -50.8% | +31.6% | -7.4% |
| 6M | -0.8% | -66.5% | +65.6% | +21.0% |
| YTD | +33.2% | -81.3% | +114.5% | +72.4% |
| 1Y | +38.5% | -84.8% | +123.3% | +87.1% |
| All | +38.5% | -85.5% | +124.0% | +87.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling