+65.1%
TNA vs ACGL
+4.8%
+60.3%
-32.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -1.7% | +2.5% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -0.7% | +0.7% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -4.9% | -1.0% | -3.9% | -5.1% |
| 3M | +0.4% | +11.0% | -10.7% | +2.8% |
| 6M | +32.5% | -0.3% | +32.9% | +34.1% |
| YTD | +53.7% | +2.3% | +51.4% | +55.6% |
| 1Y | +65.1% | +6.4% | +58.7% | +67.4% |
| All | +65.1% | +4.8% | +60.3% | +67.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling