+37.9%
TMUS vs NVD
-99.1%
+137.0%
-37.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | NVD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +4.5% | -4.6% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -5.8% | +9.0% | -14.8% | -5.9% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -5.5% | +5.2% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -4.0% | -24.6% | +20.7% | -3.7% |
| 6M | -18.1% | -42.1% | +24.0% | -17.8% |
| YTD | -11.3% | -44.3% | +33.0% | -11.0% |
| 1Y | -24.7% | -54.2% | +29.4% | -24.5% |
| 3Y | +35.4% | -99.1% | +134.5% | +27.3% |
| All | +37.9% | -99.1% | +137.0% | +29.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling