-16.7%
TLN vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+83.2%
-34.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.8% | -3.8% | +7.5% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -8.0% | +15.1% | +7.2% |
| 30D | -3.9% | -27.9% | +24.0% | -3.6% |
| 3M | -16.2% | -74.6% | +58.4% | -17.7% |
| 6M | -5.8% | -99.5% | +93.6% | -11.1% |
| YTD | -15.4% | -99.7% | +84.3% | -22.9% |
| 1Y | -16.7% | -99.9% | +83.2% | -23.0% |
| All | -16.7% | -99.9% | +83.2% | -23.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling