+37.7%
THC vs LDOS
-24.0%
+61.7%
-34.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | +0.5% | +0.1% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -5.4% | +4.8% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +1.3% | +4.9% | -3.6% | +1.3% |
| 3M | +64.2% | +7.2% | +57.1% | +60.3% |
| 6M | +8.3% | -24.2% | +32.5% | +0.1% |
| YTD | +33.4% | -25.8% | +59.2% | +17.2% |
| 1Y | +37.7% | -24.7% | +62.4% | +18.5% |
| All | +37.7% | -24.0% | +61.7% | +18.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling