+88.6%
TGT vs ZM
+8.0%
+80.6%
-12.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.6% | 0.0% | +5.6% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -8.4% | +17.9% | +9.8% |
| 30D | +6.6% | -1.9% | +8.5% | +6.5% |
| 3M | +11.0% | -10.1% | +21.0% | +11.4% |
| 6M | +29.9% | -13.9% | +43.7% | +29.7% |
| YTD | +71.4% | +6.4% | +65.0% | +69.4% |
| 1Y | +88.6% | +9.6% | +79.0% | +84.5% |
| All | +88.6% | +8.0% | +80.6% | +84.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling