+202.1%
TER vs MSTZ
-99.2%
+301.2%
-51.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | +5.5% | -2.3% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +12.4% | -23.6% | +35.9% | +10.3% |
| 30D | +5.1% | -60.7% | +65.9% | -1.8% |
| 3M | +4.0% | -58.3% | +62.2% | 0.0% |
| 6M | +29.5% | -60.0% | +89.6% | +28.3% |
| YTD | +98.5% | -75.2% | +173.7% | +96.4% |
| 1Y | +234.1% | -19.9% | +254.0% | +271.7% |
| All | +202.1% | -99.2% | +301.2% | +167.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling