+52.2%
TEM vs LCID
-83.1%
+135.3%
-59.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.7% | -7.8% | +3.1% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -9.3% | +8.3% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +11.3% | -35.4% | +46.7% | +23.7% |
| 3M | +25.5% | -17.1% | +42.6% | +24.9% |
| 6M | +17.1% | -58.9% | +76.1% | +41.3% |
| YTD | +3.8% | -59.6% | +63.4% | +24.1% |
| 1Y | -24.4% | -78.0% | +53.6% | +6.6% |
| All | +52.2% | -83.1% | +135.3% | +105.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling