+87.2%
STLD vs PFGC
-5.1%
+92.3%
-22.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -0.5% | -1.1% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +3.1% | -2.2% | +5.4% | +3.5% |
| 30D | -9.0% | -11.9% | +3.0% | -7.5% |
| 3M | -12.4% | +5.0% | -17.4% | -13.5% |
| 6M | +25.5% | +8.6% | +16.9% | +22.0% |
| YTD | +43.6% | +9.7% | +33.9% | +38.8% |
| 1Y | +87.2% | -6.3% | +93.5% | +85.5% |
| All | +87.2% | -5.1% | +92.3% | +85.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling