-52.6%
STLA vs UMAC
+2.9%
-55.6%
-66.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.8% | -10.9% | +14.7% | +3.9% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -26.0% | +25.4% | -0.4% |
| 30D | +3.6% | -40.3% | +43.9% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -20.6% | -51.1% | +30.5% | -20.1% |
| 6M | -34.3% | -5.6% | -28.7% | -32.9% |
| YTD | -57.3% | +2.3% | -59.6% | -55.2% |
| 1Y | -52.6% | +7.9% | -60.5% | -49.3% |
| All | -52.6% | +2.9% | -55.6% | -49.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling