-99.8%
SOXS vs UMAC
+164.0%
-263.8%
-99.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -10.2% | -3.1% | -7.1% | -11.4% |
| 7D | -7.0% | -0.9% | -6.1% | -7.3% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -7.7% | +10.5% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -26.4% | +16.6% | -1.6% |
| 6M | -99.2% | +61.9% | -161.0% | -98.5% |
| YTD | -99.5% | +86.5% | -186.0% | -99.0% |
| 1Y | -99.8% | +156.3% | -256.1% | -99.5% |
| All | -99.8% | +164.0% | -263.8% | -99.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling