+433.2%
SNDK vs UMAC
+2.9%
+430.3%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.9% | -10.9% | +3.0% | -5.4% |
| 7D | -26.2% | -26.0% | -0.1% | -20.8% |
| 30D | -39.1% | -40.3% | +1.2% | -31.8% |
| 3M | -27.3% | -51.1% | +23.8% | -16.9% |
| 6M | -17.4% | -5.6% | -11.7% | -18.7% |
| YTD | +337.0% | +2.3% | +334.7% | +286.6% |
| 1Y | +433.2% | +7.9% | +425.3% | +356.1% |
| All | +433.2% | +2.9% | +430.3% | +356.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling