+146.9%
SMTC vs NIO
-37.4%
+184.3%
-40.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | -1.6% | +10.8% | +9.7% |
| 7D | +12.7% | -13.0% | +25.8% | +17.6% |
| 30D | +22.0% | -18.3% | +40.2% | +29.5% |
| 3M | -12.7% | -33.2% | +20.5% | -1.1% |
| 6M | +64.8% | -21.5% | +86.3% | +75.6% |
| YTD | +100.7% | -25.5% | +126.2% | +116.6% |
| 1Y | +146.9% | -38.0% | +184.9% | +188.7% |
| All | +146.9% | -37.4% | +184.3% | +188.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling