+96.2%
SMH vs NTAP
+61.4%
+34.8%
-24.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +0.1% | +2.5% | +2.6% |
| 7D | +2.5% | -0.8% | +3.3% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -0.5% | +0.1% | -0.5% |
| 3M | -9.6% | +4.1% | -13.7% | -11.1% |
| 6M | +42.1% | +88.0% | -45.9% | +13.8% |
| YTD | +57.4% | +75.6% | -18.1% | +30.5% |
| 1Y | +96.2% | +58.9% | +37.3% | +76.4% |
| All | +96.2% | +61.4% | +34.8% | +76.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling