+62.0%
SLV vs UMAC
+164.0%
-102.0%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -3.1% | +1.9% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -0.9% | +0.6% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +6.7% | -7.7% | +14.3% | +6.7% |
| 3M | -10.7% | -26.4% | +15.7% | -9.6% |
| 6M | -20.6% | +61.9% | -82.5% | -29.5% |
| YTD | -7.1% | +86.5% | -93.6% | -19.2% |
| 1Y | +62.0% | +156.3% | -94.3% | +33.3% |
| All | +62.0% | +164.0% | -102.0% | +33.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling