+46.2%
SLB vs UMC
+112.5%
-66.3%
-22.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -2.1% | +1.0% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -14.7% | +10.6% | -3.6% |
| 30D | +2.5% | -32.9% | +35.4% | +3.7% |
| 3M | +2.0% | -22.2% | +24.2% | +2.5% |
| 6M | -6.3% | +25.9% | -32.3% | -10.5% |
| YTD | +36.5% | +107.9% | -71.4% | +32.7% |
| 1Y | +46.2% | +115.0% | -68.8% | +40.4% |
| All | +46.2% | +112.5% | -66.3% | +40.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling